🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This action is a direct warning by the Kremlin against plans to use immobilized Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on accounts in local state media, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to determine later this week on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and economic needs.

Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union officials have argued that their proposal is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of retaliatory actions, such as seizing European corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a severe assault on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in EU countries are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials said they are working on measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. They are also designing protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be obligated to return the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."