🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has maintained a prohibition on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the executive power with an expanded panel of 11 judges. The court also vacated a previous decision from a three-judge panel that had supported the administration.

Legal Saga Over Military Presence

This legal directive represents the most recent turn in a protracted legal battle over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to send state military units in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was started in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has argued that government employees at the immigration center in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have command of the situation.

Contrary to descriptions of the city as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing videos of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and organizing activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in Portland issued two legal injunctions this period – one blocking the federal control of the state troops, and another prohibiting the deployment of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to evade the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the physical sending of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under consideration simultaneously – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that facts are important and that the judicial system are striving to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the president cannot send the military into American urban areas without cause. We will continue protecting state legislation, values, and autonomy as this case progresses and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”